Researchers harness viruses to split water (4/13/2010)
 | | Angela Belcher, the Germeshausen Professor of Materials Science and Engineering and Biological Engineering, demonstrates a virus-templated catalyst solution used in harnessing energy from water. - Photo: Dominick Reuter |
A team of MIT researchers has found a novel way to mimic the process by which plants use the power of sunlight to split water and make chemical fuel to power their growth. In this case, the team used a modified virus as a kind of biological scaffold that can assemble the nanoscale components needed to split a water molecule into hydrogen and oxygen atoms.
Splitting water is one way to solve the basic problem of solar energy: It's only available when the sun shines. By using sunlight to make hydrogen from water, the hydrogen can then be stored and used at any time to generate electricity using a fuel cell, or to make liquid fuels (or be used directly) for cars and trucks.
Other researchers have made systems that use electricity, which can be provided by solar panels, to split water molecules, but the new biologically based system skips the intermediate steps and uses sunlight to power the reaction directly. The advance is described in a paper published on April 11 in Nature Nanotechnology.
The team, led by Angela Belcher, the Germeshausen Professor of Materials Science and Engineering and Biological Engineering, engineered a common, harmless bacterial virus called M13 so that it would attract and bind with molecules of a catalyst (the team used iridium oxide) and a biological pigment (zinc porphyrins). The viruses became wire-like devices that could very efficiently split the oxygen from water molecules.
Over time, however, the virus-wires would clump together and lose their effectiveness, so the researchers added an extra step: encapsulating them in a microgel matrix, so they maintained their uniform arrangement and kept their stability and efficiency.
While hydrogen obtained from water is the gas that would be used as a fuel, the splitting of oxygen from water is the more technically challenging "half-reaction" in the process, Belcher explains, so her team focused on this part. Plants and cyanobacteria (also called blue-green algae), she says, "have evolved highly organized photosynthetic systems for the efficient oxidation of water." Other researchers have tried to use the photosynthetic parts of plants directly for harnessing sunlight, but these materials can have structural stability issues.
Belcher decided that instead of borrowing plants' components, she would borrow their methods. In plant cells, natural pigments are used to absorb sunlight, while catalysts then promote the water-splitting reaction. That's the process Belcher and her team, including doctoral student Yoon Sung Nam, the lead author of the new paper, decided to imitate.
In the team's system, the viruses simply act as a kind of scaffolding, causing the pigments and catalysts to line up with the right kind of spacing to trigger the water-splitting reaction. The role of the pigments is "to act as an antenna to capture the light," Belcher explains, "and then transfer the energy down the length of the virus, like a wire. The virus is a very efficient harvester of light, with these porphyrins attached.
"We use components people have used before," she adds, "but we use biology to organize them for us, so you get better efficiency."
Using the virus to make the system assemble itself improves the efficiency of the oxygen production fourfold, Nam says. The researchers hope to find a similar biologically based system to perform the other half of the process, the production of hydrogen. Currently, the hydrogen atoms from the water get split into their component protons and electrons; a second part of the system, now being developed, would combine these back into hydrogen atoms and molecules. The team is also working to find a more commonplace, less-expensive material for the catalyst, to replace the relatively rare and costly iridium used in this proof-of-concept study.
Thomas Mallouk, the DuPont Professor of Materials Chemistry and Physics at Pennsylvania State University, who was not involved in this work, says, "This is an extremely clever piece of work that addresses one of the most difficult problems in artificial photosynthesis, namely, the nanoscale organization of the components in order to control electron transfer rates."
He adds: "There is a daunting combination of problems to be solved before this or any other artificial photosynthetic system could actually be useful for energy conversion." To be cost-competitive with other approaches to solar power, he says, the system would need to be at least 10 times more efficient than natural photosynthesis, be able to repeat the reaction a billion times, and use less expensive materials. "This is unlikely to happen in the near future," he says. "Nevertheless, the design idea illustrated in this paper could ultimately help with an important piece of the puzzle."
Belcher will not even speculate about how long it might take to develop this into a commercial product, but she says that within two years she expects to have a prototype device that can carry out the whole process of splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen, using a self-sustaining and durable system.
Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments:
| 1. |
bailey |
4/13/2010 2:38:58 AM MST |
it always amazes me that science types don't watch horror movies.. so.. we have a planet that mostly water ... and then this thing gets out of the jar... reminds me of the story of when these new bacteria showed up and killed almost everything by spewing toxic oxygen into the atmosphere... |
| 2. |
it |
4/14/2010 2:15:29 AM MST |
it always amazes ME that science types tend to ignore implausible outlandish ideas, fetched from the depths of ignorance and clouded judgment |
| 3. |
Brandon M. Sergent |
4/20/2010 4:49:26 AM MST |
I don't know, regardless of the Grey Goo only with water scenario being plausible or not, I question the wisdom of turning water into the next gasoline.
Do we really want a desert-like mad max type future? (however far away)
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't water a finite resource?
I really question the wisdom of looking for new ways you Burn the stuff we drink, swim in bathe and clean with. You know?
|
| 4. |
grad |
4/25/2010 3:58:43 AM MST |
does no one know any chemistry?
there's a lot of water on this planet because it's a stable awesome compound:
this is chemical kinetics 101
a) this bio-thing is supposed to be unstable so it'll probably breakdown fast in the environment
b) if it gets out - even if it splits hydrogen and oxygen, they'll just recombine into water
c)the heat gained by this oxidation is the heat that would have been gained if the water had just absorbed the sun's radiation energy in the first place.
artards
|
| 5. |
Ben Koshkin |
5/14/2010 8:20:12 PM MST |
It's neat research, but how long will it be before we have a viable way to do this economically?
Ben Koshkin
|
| 6. |
Tod Merley |
5/21/2010 7:19:17 PM MST |
Here the hydrogen and oxygen being temporarily split make an energy storage mechanism. We could use a bit more O2 in the environment but regardless the Hydrogen will be joined back with it's oxygen minus the energy it took to split them in the first place thus preserving the natural resource while making sunlight power whatever we would. We are simply moving the energy from one place to the other - that is all.
I would call this exciting!
Have fun all!
|
| 7. |
Bob Downs |
5/27/2010 3:50:29 PM MST |
While this development may be viewed with some interest, as the last paragraph indicates, this is nowhere near a practical technique at this time.
No efficiency or timescale information is given so no comparison to other methods can be made.
|
| 8. |
meratol |
1/9/2011 10:34:30 AM MST |
I think this is one of the most important info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The web site style is ideal, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers |
| 9. |
jessica |
1/22/2011 8:54:34 PM MST |
I agree with Bob. There has to be a practical technique for this to get anywhere. |
Leave a Reply:
|